<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook&#8217;s About-Face</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ashesblog.com/2009/02/19/facebooks-about-face/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ashesblog.com/2009/02/19/facebooks-about-face/</link>
	<description>Celebrating Western Civilization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.S. Palmer</title>
		<link>http://ashesblog.com/2009/02/19/facebooks-about-face/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N.S. Palmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashesblog.com/?p=709#comment-64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s literally true. When Nobel laureate economist Milton Friedman wrote that &quot;the social responsibility of business is to make profits,&quot; I think he assumed that corporations would still abide by standards of decent human behaviour. He was wrong. Because of the way they are set up as institutions, corporations are designed to pursue profit at the expense of all other values. Some corporations, under the leadership of morally enlightened top management, do follow a better path. However, their incentives discourage them from acting decently and encourage them to act without conscience. Sooner or later, the incentives tend to win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s literally true. When Nobel laureate economist Milton Friedman wrote that &#8220;the social responsibility of business is to make profits,&#8221; I think he assumed that corporations would still abide by standards of decent human behaviour. He was wrong. Because of the way they are set up as institutions, corporations are designed to pursue profit at the expense of all other values. Some corporations, under the leadership of morally enlightened top management, do follow a better path. However, their incentives discourage them from acting decently and encourage them to act without conscience. Sooner or later, the incentives tend to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lone Primate</title>
		<link>http://ashesblog.com/2009/02/19/facebooks-about-face/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lone Primate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashesblog.com/?p=709#comment-63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Without strong government regulation, corporations by their nature will act like psychopaths...&quot;

You know, a lot of people treat that as hyperbole but there&#039;s real truth to it when you think about it.  Huge, almost unbridled power, united to intelligence with no accountability and no one responsible for providing it with a conscience.  And then people want the government to get off the backs of big business.  They should really sit back and think about what they&#039;re asking for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Without strong government regulation, corporations by their nature will act like psychopaths&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>You know, a lot of people treat that as hyperbole but there&#8217;s real truth to it when you think about it.  Huge, almost unbridled power, united to intelligence with no accountability and no one responsible for providing it with a conscience.  And then people want the government to get off the backs of big business.  They should really sit back and think about what they&#8217;re asking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.S. Palmer</title>
		<link>http://ashesblog.com/2009/02/19/facebooks-about-face/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N.S. Palmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashesblog.com/?p=709#comment-62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you in principle, but it was public outcry that got Facebook to rescind the new policy.

Dealing with corporations these days is like ducking bullets from an automatic weapon. Their abusive policies come at you in such great numbers and from so many different directions that it&#039;s impossible to detect, let alone avoid, all of them. That&#039;s how the practice works. Even to read every terms of service agreement and amendment that corporations fire at you would be practically a full-time job. And if you don&#039;t agree with some abusive provision, what can you do about it? Competition has been replaced by oligopoly and monopoly.

One of the most horrific examples of corporate abuse is biotechnology companies&#039; use of their terms of sale agreements to prevent any independent, unbiased research into the safety of genetically-engineered crops: see the New York Times article here: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/business/20crop.html.

Without strong government regulation, corporations by their nature will act like psychopaths: see the book &quot;The Corporation&quot; for a good history and analysis: http://www.amazon.com/Corporation-Pathological-Pursuit-Profit-Power/dp/0743247469/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1235327264&amp;sr=1-1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you in principle, but it was public outcry that got Facebook to rescind the new policy.</p>
<p>Dealing with corporations these days is like ducking bullets from an automatic weapon. Their abusive policies come at you in such great numbers and from so many different directions that it&#8217;s impossible to detect, let alone avoid, all of them. That&#8217;s how the practice works. Even to read every terms of service agreement and amendment that corporations fire at you would be practically a full-time job. And if you don&#8217;t agree with some abusive provision, what can you do about it? Competition has been replaced by oligopoly and monopoly.</p>
<p>One of the most horrific examples of corporate abuse is biotechnology companies&#8217; use of their terms of sale agreements to prevent any independent, unbiased research into the safety of genetically-engineered crops: see the New York Times article here: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/business/20crop.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/business/20crop.html</a>.</p>
<p>Without strong government regulation, corporations by their nature will act like psychopaths: see the book &#8220;The Corporation&#8221; for a good history and analysis: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Corporation-Pathological-Pursuit-Profit-Power/dp/0743247469/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1235327264&#038;sr=1-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Corporation-Pathological-Pursuit-Profit-Power/dp/0743247469/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1235327264&#038;sr=1-1</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://ashesblog.com/2009/02/19/facebooks-about-face/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashesblog.com/?p=709#comment-61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It makes no sense that Facebook would risk messing up a good thing by edging in on people&#039;s intellectual property.  They had people&#039;s trust and then they go and risk losing it; not smart.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes no sense that Facebook would risk messing up a good thing by edging in on people&#8217;s intellectual property.  They had people&#8217;s trust and then they go and risk losing it; not smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N.S. Palmer</title>
		<link>http://ashesblog.com/2009/02/19/facebooks-about-face/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N.S. Palmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashesblog.com/?p=709#comment-60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good point. Yes, you&#039;re right. The regulations would have to be detailed, specific, and often adapted to the particular industries they covered.

However, corporations have legal departments whose full-time job is to stay informed about such things. As a result, their situation is not comparable to that of individual consumers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good point. Yes, you&#8217;re right. The regulations would have to be detailed, specific, and often adapted to the particular industries they covered.</p>
<p>However, corporations have legal departments whose full-time job is to stay informed about such things. As a result, their situation is not comparable to that of individual consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lone Primate</title>
		<link>http://ashesblog.com/2009/02/19/facebooks-about-face/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lone Primate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashesblog.com/?p=709#comment-59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And of course, the regulation should be written in the same Sir Humpreyesque legalese... :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course, the regulation should be written in the same Sir Humpreyesque legalese&#8230; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

